Foundation

Case Study: How a Whistleblower Exposed a Corporate Governance Failure

A foundation case study of the ICICI Bank and Videocon affair, the Indian case that best shows how a whistleblower can expose a governance failure that auditors, regulators and the board missed. You will see how a Videocon shareholder's 2016 letters alleged a conflict of interest between the bank's CEO Chanda Kochhar and a group the bank lent to, why nothing visible happened for two years, how the board first gave a clean chit in March 2018 and then ordered an independent inquiry under Justice B.N. Srikrishna, and how the case moved to the CBI, ED, SEBI and the courts. The course then breaks down exactly what failed: disclosure, recusal and the board's first response, and how ICICI Bank used clawbacks to restore accountability. It finishes with what investors, compliance professionals and would-be whistleblowers should take from the case, including a simple checklist for judging any whistleblower allegation against an NSE or BSE listed company.

WhistleblowersConflict of InterestBoard OversightIndependent InquiriesClawbacksSEBI and CBI EnforcementBank Governance
MODULES
5
DURATION
~2.75 hrs
TRACK
Forensic Accounting & Compliance

What You'll Master

How the ICICI Bank loans to the Videocon group and the NuPower Renewables link created the alleged conflict of interest
What the whistleblower alleged, who he wrote to, and why the complaint took two years to gain traction
How the board's March 2018 clean chit turned into an independent inquiry and a termination for cause
How the case moved through the CBI, ED, SEBI and the courts, and what each body does
Why disclosure and recusal rules failed, and how bonus clawbacks restored some accountability
How to judge a whistleblower allegation against a listed company as an investor, and how to raise a concern safely as an employee
Access Level
LEARNER
Everything included
Full Text Playbooks
Actionable Exercises
Mobile Reading Mode
Lifetime Updates

Curriculum Breakdown